Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://14.139.60.153/handle/123456789/1139
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDirectorate of Adult Education
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-03T05:59:32Z
dc.date.available2013-07-03T05:59:32Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.otherD09108
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1139
dc.description49 pgs.en_US
dc.description.abstractIt is well realised that the method of teaching alone will not be the only factor in the attainment of literacy skills. No one method is ideal in all situations and for all learners. Much will depend upon the organisation of the programme, motivation of learners, the quality of teaching and the class room activities. But it has been assumed that the above conditions will remain almost constant in a Mass Literacy Campaign. Hence, this study tries to compare the effectiveness of the letter and the word method of teaching in the light of the following limited number of variables only.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNational Literacy Mission, Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhien_US
dc.subjectTeaching Methodsen_US
dc.subjectAdult Educationen_US
dc.subjectNational Literacy Missionen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Study of the Analytic and Synthetic Methods of Teachingen_US
Appears in Collections:Government Documents

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANALYTIC & SYNTHETIC METHODS OF TEACHING _D-9108.pdf826.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NIEPA Digital Archives are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.